Successful or Fruitful
January 9, 2009
![]()
![]()
There is a great difference between successfulness and fruitfulness. Success comes from strength, control, and respectability. A successful person has the energy to create something, to keep control over its development, and to make it available in large quantities. Success brings many rewards and often fame. Fruits, however, come from weakness and vulnerability. And fruits are unique. A child is the fruit conceived in vulnerability, community is the fruit born through shared brokenness, and intimacy is the fruit that grows through touching one another’s wounds. Let’s remind one another that what brings us true joy is not successfulness but fruitfulness. -Henri Nouwen Bread for the Journey
One of the great mistakes many of us is making today is to confuse being successful with being fruitful. We can be successful on our own, but only God’s grace produces fruitfulness. Being successful brings glory to ourselves, validating our efforts and practices while fruitfulness brings glory to God, validating us as disciples of Jesus Christ. Being successful is valued and applauded by men, while being fruitful is enjoyed and applauded by God. Success goes public and takes center stage, fruitfulness often takes place in private and remains a secret. Success can happen overnight, fruitfulness takes time. Success is born from our own strength, fruitfulness is born out of vulnerability. Success kills the soul, while fruitfulness carries with it great joy.
Is your current rhythm of life designed to produce fruit or to make you successful? What does your soul truly crave?
Comments
5 Comments to “Successful or Fruitful”
Got something to say?
(From an article I wrote several years ago for the Evangelical Missions Quarterly)
After several years serving as a missionary, my family and I spent several months in the US. During that time, it was my privilege to mow a friend’s “postage stamp-sized” lawn. After finishing, I experienced an incredible sense of joy and accomplishment. Surprised by the level of pleasure derived, I realized that the simple process of identifying a need, initiating a response, and successfully completing the entire task was an experience I had not had for a long time. Simply stated, I had been effective, and it felt good.
In missions, much of what we do is “spiritual.” Thus, almost by definition, it proves difficult to know when we have done well, when we have done enough, when we have really finished a task, when we have been effective and fruitful. When have enough people come to Christ? When are believers mature enough? When are the leaders adequately trained? And what about our colleagues who labor faithfully in less-responsive or non-responsive areas? How do they measure effectiveness and success? What about the many of us who work behind the frontlines of missionary labor as administrators, missionary care-givers, teachers of missionary children? How can we measure our effectiveness.
This dilemma can lead to confusion, frustration and, sometimes, disillusionment. What are the right measuring sticks for determining effectiveness and fruitfulness whether it is in missions, in the office, in the classroom as student or teacher, in the workplace, in the home.
Now, of course there are objective measuring sticks in each of these environments: number of churches planted, number of new believers, ministry trips completed, classes taught, grades received, units sold, meals prepared. Yet, how often can people come up with good numbers in every objective category and still, when all is said and one, ask themselves (ourselves): have I been effective, have I been fruitful?
I believe we need to be especially clear and biblical in how we, as believers, ultimately assess effectiveness.
At the end of the year, most mission agencies prepare year-end reports: for boards of directors, for the IRS, for their constituents, for their own internal consumption. Many of these reports demonstrate our “success” (or lack thereof) in reaching our stated or unstated ministry goals during the previous twelve months. Figures are gathered and correlated, columns are added, goals or objectives are examined and evaluated. Did we reach the goal? Was the objective worth the effort and the cost? Why didn’t those churches get planted? Why did so many come to Christ in this country or region or city and so few in that other? Are our people strategically placed? Are our people being effective? Are they bearing the fruit for which they went out with such joyful anticipation and at such great cost?
Year’s end can be a time of great insecurity and beguilement for many missionaries. This is especially true when their field of service or their particular role does not clearly add to the figures and statistics being gathered and disseminated. Now, the gathering and reporting of numbers is not wrong. The Acts of the Apostles recorded numbers and suggested quantities, large and small. Luke’s purpose, however, was not to underscore Pauline efficiency or Petrine effectiveness. His point was humbly and thankfully to illustrate the overwhelming power of the gospel in and through the lives of those who “had been with Jesus.” When Paul reported back to the church in Antioch, it was not merely to fulfill his sense of accountability, it was also to draw those first “senders” onto the front lines as true partners in the work.
Nevertheless, numbers and statistics are double-edged swords, capable of cutting two ways. While they can remove layers of questions, doubts, and criticisms, they can also inflict injury to the hands that wield them or to others. Are cross-cultural workers merely (or nearly) the sum of their yearly figures or the degree to which their (measurable or faith) goals are reached? Is that the true or the best indicator of their effectiveness and fruitfulness? Let me answer with a firm, resounding, and biblical, “No!”
Some twenty-odd (sometimes very odd) years ago, I entered my first pastoral ministry in a small, rural church. Initially, my goal was the establishment of a youth ministry. Later, it became to provide pastoral care to the whole flock. A dear friend (who today would be called a mentor) wrote some marvelous words of counsel. His words spoke to the deep needs of my heart in 1974, and they still speak today. I had written to him expressing anxiety concerning the frutifulness of my ministry. With surprising little “commentary,” he wrote back and commended to me the reading of 2 Peter 1:5-9:
For this very reason, make every effort to add to your faith goodness; and to goodness, knowledge; and to knowledge, self-control; and to self-control, perseverance; and to perseverance, godliness; and to godliness, brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness, love. For if you possess these qualities in increasing measure, they will keep you from being ineffective and unfruitful in your knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. But if anyone does not have them, he is nearsighted and blind, and has forgotten that he has been cleansed from his past sins.
After listing eight non quantifiable qualities, Peter makes an incredibly powerful and liberating declaration. He states down through the ages that the essence of Christian life and ministry is internal and relational. Effectiveness, fruitfulness, success, productivity are to be found in and based upon the establishing, the nurturing, the growth of godly character in the context of righteous relationships.
A current debate in American political circles discusses the role and value of character in effective and fruitful leadership. Peter’s words demonstrate the foolishness of this debate. In God’s “mathematics,” character must never be separated from the question of effectiveness. Godly character plus faithful perseverance always equals fruitfulness and a deeper experience of our Lord Jesus.
It is not my purpose here to exegete this passage nor to define all the terms. I leave that for the reader’s joy and edification. I will underscore, however, that each of the characteristics mentioned grows and matures in the context of relationships: to oneself, to one another, and to God. Peter reminds his readers that they were saved, cleansed from their sins, and brought into the knowledge of God for the express purpose of developing character in the context of vibrant, life-changing relationships. From this abundant and powerful source flows effective ministry.
In our legitimate quest for fruitfulness in evangelism, church planting, leadership development, administration, or in whatever tasks we find ourselves, we must not lose sight of the character issues. Our spouses and children, our missionary teammates, colleagues and leaders, our national co workers, even our supporters can legitimately demand to see in us the qualities commended to us by Peter. If our lives and ministries are characterized by these characteristics in ever-increasing measure, we can be assured that we are and will continue to be effective and fruitful. Where these are not present, no amount of “objective ministry achievement” or “accomplishment of faith goals” can make up for their lack.
If you want to engage in a really scary but helpful evaluation process, ask your spouse if he or she detects a greater degree of goodness developing in you over the last year. Ask a teammate if you are exhibiting more perseverance than in the past. Ask one of your kids if they can see greater self-control in the way you interact with them and others. Ask a national co-worker (maybe your office secretary if you have one) is there are concrete evidences of godliness and brotherly kindness. Their responses will not be reflected in the mission’s end-of-the-year report, but, according to Peter, your fruitfulness and effectiveness are directly tied to the answers you hear.
If such questions and interaction are inadequate, not feasible, or too threatening, you can still get the feedback you need. Schedule a personal retreat. Take a day or a few days alone to ask yourself and to ask God how you are doing in these areas. Write each of these characteristics on a separate piece of paper. Using other resources, define and describe these terms. Write down what they look like in the lives of other believers. Then, one by one, in partnership with the Holy Spirit consider how you are doing, where you are lacking, where growth is needed, where progress has been made. Be specific, be honest, and be thorough. When you have finished, ask God to show you what steps need to be taken to grow in these areas. Finally, commit yourself to doing whatever God says.
After your retreat, share what you have learned with someone whose judgment you trust. Ask them to interact honestly with your observations and evaluation. Consider making yourself accountable to that person or to someone else for the specific steps needed for growth. Only when we take these issues seriously will we begin to experience fruitful ministry and a deepening relationship with God.
No amount of conversions made or churches planted, no number of conferences led or seminars completed, no listing of reports filed or articles written can produce truly effective and fruitful lives in the absence of these qualities. No ministry “totals” can be considered small and insignificant when accompanied by an ever-increasing knowledge of God displayed through our character in the context of genuinely righteous relationships.
Jamie, I am afraid that I am still often lean towards the rhythm of “success” than “fruitfulness.” However as I get older I notice the balance is tipping in the other direction.
Rick, thanks for sharing this excellent article.
Thinking of the fruit that our actions may produce, or the outcomes of our ways of living, are good ways to tackle each day and each ministry project.
Thanks for bringing Nouwen’s thoughts to our attention, Jamie. Struggling with the issues he raises in all his writings is always challenging.
Nouwen lived what he preached. This is compelling. Here’s a person (a priest) with a very successful career as a psychologist at an Ivy League university, saying that he wants his life to be more fruitful. What did he mean? What does he do? He quits and goes to work with the poor in Latin America. He also works at l’Abri in Toronto (the priest of the center), Canada where he is assigned a severely handicapped person to care for daily. The fruit which these serving actions produced is a Henri Nouwen that is more conformed to the image of Christ, the ultimate fruitfulness and the one which our missional order seeks.
Good point regarding Nouwen who lived out St. Francis of
Assissi’s “motto”: preach all the time; when necessary, use words.
btw, Nouwen worked at L’Arche (Jean Vanier) rather than L’Abri (Francis Schaeffer).
I stand corrected, Rick. Thanks.